Categories
the orchestra world

great criticism

Alex Ross has an article in the week’s New Yorker concerning recent Beethoven and Shostakovich symphony cycles, and it’s a model for what I think music criticism should be: informative, contextual and insightful. Find the review here.

One reply on “great criticism”

[…] Here’s a great article on classical music: The New Yorker – Beethoven and Shostakovich symphony cycles. I was made aware of this excellent example of music criticism via a post by Charles Noble on the Daily Observations blog. Sample extract: Yet the two composers [ie Beethoven and Shostakovich] are not polar opposites. Beethoven, too, has his wry, perverse, morbid, obsessive moods. Think of the transfixingly strange Scherzo of the Fifth Symphony, when the music effectively stops moving and the timpanist drums lightly on the note C like a finger tapping on a pane. All the jubilation that follows can sound like an attempt to forget whatever existential threat the Scherzo poses. Conversely, Shostakovich at his bleakest still offers his listeners slivers of hope, usually in the form of cryptic jokes. The Sixth Symphony begins with an extended, multipart theme, a kind of solemn oration. In the second section, where you would expect to find a rigorous development of the initial material, Shostakovich instead picks out two details—a minor third and a decorative trill—and fixates on them in a fabulously eerie hundred-and-twenty-bar passage, as if to prove that he can hold you enthralled with next to nothing. At that moment, he and Beethoven are essentially playing the same occult symphonic game. […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: