<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the orchestral shakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nobleviola.com/2008/09/29/the-orchestral-shakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nobleviola.com/2008/09/29/the-orchestral-shakes/</link>
	<description>Life on the working end of the viola.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Noble</title>
		<link>http://www.nobleviola.com/2008/09/29/the-orchestral-shakes/comment-page-1/#comment-12458</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobleviola.com/wordpress/?p=1191#comment-12458</guid>
		<description>Well put! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put! <img src='http://www.nobleviola.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos</title>
		<link>http://www.nobleviola.com/2008/09/29/the-orchestral-shakes/comment-page-1/#comment-12457</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobleviola.com/wordpress/?p=1191#comment-12457</guid>
		<description>Allow me a risky (and tongue in cheek) metaphor:Beethoven is the pizza of the classical music world. Even if it is not served &quot;perfect&quot; or even served warmed over, it is still enjoyable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me a risky (and tongue in cheek) metaphor:Beethoven is the pizza of the classical music world. Even if it is not served &#8220;perfect&#8221; or even served warmed over, it is still enjoyable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Noble</title>
		<link>http://www.nobleviola.com/2008/09/29/the-orchestral-shakes/comment-page-1/#comment-12451</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobleviola.com/wordpress/?p=1191#comment-12451</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, Lorin!  The choir sounded great, as usual, and there were some sections that seemed much stronger than in previous years, especially the tenors and altos.  And it&#039;s such a high tenor part!  Great going, and the Vaughan Williams was some beautiful English choral singing - what I love best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Lorin!  The choir sounded great, as usual, and there were some sections that seemed much stronger than in previous years, especially the tenors and altos.  And it&#8217;s such a high tenor part!  Great going, and the Vaughan Williams was some beautiful English choral singing &#8211; what I love best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorin Wilkerson</title>
		<link>http://www.nobleviola.com/2008/09/29/the-orchestral-shakes/comment-page-1/#comment-12445</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorin Wilkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobleviola.com/wordpress/?p=1191#comment-12445</guid>
		<description>I read Stabler&#039;s review...I didn&#039;t think it was as problematic as he seemed to, but then again, from my perch in the choir loft I&#039;m sure things sound very  different.

The 9th is an interesting piece for choristers, especially with multiple performances one right after another.  One becomes intimately familiar (from a passive listening standpoint) with the first three movements during the &#039;long sit,&#039; as I&#039;ve come to call it.  

I really thought that Monday night&#039;s performance was the best from the orchestra, especially during the Scherzo.  This word is probably way over-used in music criticism (any kind of criticism really) but if it applies to anything it applies to this scherzo, so I say without hesitation that it was &#039;rollicking&#039; good fun...the tempo was crisp, it seemed like the players were really feeling each other and moved with a common goal in mind, and when necessary the orchestra did a good job of relying on the maestro, who was able to hold things together any time something threatened to get out of hand (so of course that didn&#039;t happen.)  I was glad to be able to thank Jun Iwasaki in person after the show for such a good performance. And his violin solo in the Vaughan Williams was breathtakingly beautiful all three nights.

I thought the choir&#039;s best performance was on Sunday night; last night I felt a bit of a lack of focus; some entrances and exits weren&#039;t nearly as precise as they should have been, but it was kind of fun singing the 4th movement at such a blistering tempo.  Good times; it&#039;s always a blast to perform with the OSO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Stabler&#8217;s review&#8230;I didn&#8217;t think it was as problematic as he seemed to, but then again, from my perch in the choir loft I&#8217;m sure things sound very  different.</p>
<p>The 9th is an interesting piece for choristers, especially with multiple performances one right after another.  One becomes intimately familiar (from a passive listening standpoint) with the first three movements during the &#8216;long sit,&#8217; as I&#8217;ve come to call it.  </p>
<p>I really thought that Monday night&#8217;s performance was the best from the orchestra, especially during the Scherzo.  This word is probably way over-used in music criticism (any kind of criticism really) but if it applies to anything it applies to this scherzo, so I say without hesitation that it was &#8216;rollicking&#8217; good fun&#8230;the tempo was crisp, it seemed like the players were really feeling each other and moved with a common goal in mind, and when necessary the orchestra did a good job of relying on the maestro, who was able to hold things together any time something threatened to get out of hand (so of course that didn&#8217;t happen.)  I was glad to be able to thank Jun Iwasaki in person after the show for such a good performance. And his violin solo in the Vaughan Williams was breathtakingly beautiful all three nights.</p>
<p>I thought the choir&#8217;s best performance was on Sunday night; last night I felt a bit of a lack of focus; some entrances and exits weren&#8217;t nearly as precise as they should have been, but it was kind of fun singing the 4th movement at such a blistering tempo.  Good times; it&#8217;s always a blast to perform with the OSO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cesar</title>
		<link>http://www.nobleviola.com/2008/09/29/the-orchestral-shakes/comment-page-1/#comment-12441</link>
		<dc:creator>Cesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobleviola.com/wordpress/?p=1191#comment-12441</guid>
		<description>You know, I know exactly what you mean.  I played in college and we had our ups and downs.  When things go wrong, it&#039;s easy to get that tunnel vision and hunker down hoping things get better.  I did notice some &quot;issues&quot; on Saturday night (some wrong notes in the clarinets and horns in the 1st movement, ensemble playing in the 2nd, etc.) but I enjoyed it still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I know exactly what you mean.  I played in college and we had our ups and downs.  When things go wrong, it&#8217;s easy to get that tunnel vision and hunker down hoping things get better.  I did notice some &#8220;issues&#8221; on Saturday night (some wrong notes in the clarinets and horns in the 1st movement, ensemble playing in the 2nd, etc.) but I enjoyed it still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

